Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Equine Vet Sci ; 126: 104492, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37072071

RESUMO

Acquisition of magnetic resonance images of the equine limb is still sometimes conducted under general anaesthesia. Despite low-field systems allow the use of standard anaesthetic equipment, possible interferences of the extensive electronic componentry of advanced anaesthetic machines on image quality is unknown. This prospective, blinded, cadaver study investigated the effects of seven standardised conditions (Tafonius positioned as in clinical cases, Tafonius on the boundaries of the controlled area, anaesthetic monitoring only, Mallard anaesthetic machine, Bird ventilator, complete electronic silence in the room (negative control), source of electronic interference [positive control]) on image quality through the acquisition of 78 sequences using a 0.31T equine MRI scanner. Images were graded with a 4-point scoring system, where 1 denoted absence of artefacts and 4 major artefacts requiring repetition in a clinical setting. A lack of STIR fat suppression was commonly reported (16/26). Ordinal logistic regression showed no statistically significant differences in image quality between the negative control and either the non-Tafonius or the Tafonius groups (P = 0.535 and P = 0.881, respectively), and with the use of Tafonius compared to the other anaesthetic machines (P = 0.578). The only statistically significant differences in scores were observed between the positive control and the non-Tafonius (P = 0.006) and the Tafonius groups (P = 0.017). Our findings suggest that anaesthetic machines and monitoring do not appear to affect MRI scan quality and support the use of Tafonius during acquisition of images with a 0.31T MRI system in a clinical context.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Anestésicos , Doenças dos Cavalos , Cavalos , Animais , Artefatos , Estudos Prospectivos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/veterinária , Cadáver , Anestesia/veterinária
2.
Vet Surg ; 52(2): 209-220, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36420588

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To document variations in the application of equine prosthetic laryngoplasty among equine surgeons. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SAMPLE POPULATION: Six hundred and seventy-eight equine surgeons performing prosthetic laryngoplasty. METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to equine surgeons, including diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons. Questions focused on participant profile, surgical technique, antimicrobial therapy, and concurrent procedures. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on the survey output. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 128/678 individuals, mostly from experienced surgeons. Most participants used 2 prostheses (106/128, 82.8%) and a single loop was the most common method used to anchor the prosthesis in the cricoid (95/128, 74.2%) and arytenoid (125/128, 97.7%) cartilages. Use of general anesthesia was common, although 46/128 (35.9%) participants now performed most laryngoplasty surgery with standing sedation. The material used as a prosthesis varied among surgeons, although participants typically aimed to achieve grade 2 intraoperative arytenoid abduction. Participants most commonly administered perioperative systemic antimicrobial therapy for 1-3 days (57/128, 44.5%) and 48/128 (37.5%) used local antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSION: Most surgeons performed laryngoplasty with 2 prostheses, a single loop construct at the muscular process of the arytenoid cartilage and systemic antimicrobial therapy. There was variation in the preferred method of surgical restraint, prosthesis material selection, and use of local antimicrobial therapy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Long-established techniques remain popular in clinical practice despite evidence that variations offer advantages, particularly in relation to biomechanics. Other factors are also likely to influence technique selection in a clinical context.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Cavalos , Laringoplastia , Laringe , Cirurgiões , Animais , Humanos , Cartilagem Aritenoide/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Doenças dos Cavalos/cirurgia , Cavalos/cirurgia , Laringoplastia/veterinária , Laringoplastia/métodos , Laringe/cirurgia
3.
Equine Vet J ; 53(3): 469-480, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32767582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Investigation of image quality in clinical equine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may optimise diagnostic value. OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of field strength and anaesthesia on image quality in MR imaging of the equine foot in a clinical context. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical clinical study. METHODS: Fifteen equine foot studies (five studies per system) were randomly selected from the clinical databases of three MR imaging systems: low-field standing (LF St), low-field anaesthetised (LF GA) and high-field anaesthetised (HF GA). Ten experienced observers graded image quality for entire studies and seven clinically important anatomical structures within the foot (briefly, grade 1: textbook quality, grade 2: high diagnostic quality, grade 3: satisfactory diagnostic quality, grade 4: non-diagnostic). Statistical analysis assessed the effect of anaesthesia and field strength using a combination of the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: There was no difference in the proportion of entire studies of diagnostic quality between LF St (90%, 95% CI 78%-97%) and LF GA (88%, 76-95%, P = .7). No differences were evident in the proportion of diagnostic studies or median image quality gradings between LF St and LF GA when assessing individual anatomical structures (both groups all median grades = 3). There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of entire studies of diagnostic quality between LF GA and HF GA (100%, 95% CI lower bound 94%, P = .03). There were statistically significant differences in median image quality gradings between LF GA (all median grades = 3) and HF GA (median grades = 1 (5/7 structures) or 2 (2/7 structures) for all individual anatomical structures (all P < .001). The reasons reported for reduced image quality differed between systems. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Randomised selection of cases from clinical databases. Individual observer preferences may influence image quality assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Field strength is a more important influencer of image quality than anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot in clinical patients.


Assuntos
, Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Animais , Cavalos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...